Solutions / applied battery intelligence

The right evidence for the next battery decision.

YANTI gives the people responsible for battery value, safety, and reuse one operating standard across the lifecycle.

Each solution applies the same governed workflow to a different operational pressure: warranty uncertainty, fleet visibility, or circularity at scale.

Where YANTI operates

Solutions built around decisions.

Not another dashboard. A practical intelligence layer for the moments when battery history changes the answer.

01

For OEMs / warranty teams

OEM warranty & after-sales

Turn ambiguous battery claims into a repeatable evidence pathway that helps teams decide what to continue, repair, replace, or escalate.

  • —Standardize intake and characterization
  • —Separate evidence from assumption
  • —Keep a persistent warranty record

Fewer premature replacements. More defensible decisions.

Explore this workflow

02

For fleet operators

Fleet battery health

Give operators a consistent way to understand battery condition across vehicles, technicians, sites, and operating environments.

  • —Prioritize batteries by evidence
  • —Make heat, charge, and usage visible
  • —Support safer redeployment planning

More uptime. Less blind spot between service events.

Explore this workflow

03

For circularity teams

Battery circularity & second life

Create the evidence trail needed to move batteries through repair, reuse, repurposing, or retirement without losing their history.

  • —Record condition at every handoff
  • —Evaluate sufficiency before a new use
  • —Preserve provenance for the next decision

Keep more lithium in motion, with less uncertainty.

Explore this workflow

Buyer lens / measurable value

Start with the decision that carries the cost.

The right pilot is not a feature tour. It is a bounded test of whether better evidence changes a real warranty, service, fleet, or circularity decision.

01 / Decision owner

Who must approve the next action, and where does uncertainty slow them down?

02 / Evidence gap

Which charge, heat, information, or physical signal is missing, disputed, or hard to trust?

03 / Economic outcome

What should improve: avoided replacement, uptime, safer redeployment, recovery value, or review time?

04 / Pilot proof

What baseline, denominator, and time window would make the result credible to your team?